Urban equity and diversity: radical theories and deradicalized practices

October 2018
Presented at: Philosophy of the City, La Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá

In the spatialized struggle for social justice, the feminist banner is increasingly raised and foregrounded by urban activists, scholars, and policy-makers. If we asked today’s urban feminists to respond to Dolores Hayden’s question “what would a non-sexist city look like?” we might overwhelmingly hear that cities ought to be safe, inclusive, and accessible. To meet this tall but important order, they might say we ought to listen to those whose safety is at risk, those who are excluded, and those who are denied access. Today’s urban feminists tell us it is time to privilege and bring forward the voices not only of women but of the many other and multiply marginalized people whose interests have been and continue to be left out of city-building and planning. I position myself among these radical urban feminists. My doctoral fieldwork on public placemaking and alternative scenes in Ottawa (Canada) begins to point towards ways in which radical positions and theories are translated and appropriated into mainstream actions that risk reproduction of dominant normative approaches that depoliticize space; that let some people in only to reinforce the boundaries of who is to be left out. Continue reading “Urban equity and diversity: radical theories and deradicalized practices”

Boycotting the Queers: punk space and/or safe space in Ottawa

Presented at: McGill Queer Research Colloquium

Abstract: A public petition to keep the Queers out of Ottawa is not a news story you expect in 2016. Of course, in this story, the Queers are a touring US punk band from the early 80s and the petition was started by Babely Shades, a collective of artists and activists of colour and marginalized genders. In response to the claims that the show and the band reinforced homophobia and racism in the Ottawa punk scene, the show was cancelled but soon rebooked as a benefit concert for local LGBTQ youth. The story was further complicated when a member of the local opening band Shootin’ Blanx publicly came out as a “proud trans man” in defense of the Queers. Ottawa’s punk scene was left uncertain of what it would mean either to attend or not attend the otherwise highly anticipated show. This paper looks to this incident and surrounding media coverage as a preliminary attempt to disentangle some of the many complex relationships and expressions of resistance, marginal group politics, and counter-public space in Ottawa.

Gendered Analyses of the City and Feminist Theory in Planning

Reference bibliography prepared for Ph.D. Comprehensive Exam Field 2
Sarah Gelbard, October 2016

(see also Ph.D. Comprehensive Exam Field 1 Reference Bibliography)

Adams, Annmarie, and Peta Tancred. 2000. Designing women: Gender and the architectural profession. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Ahrentzen, Sherry. 2003. “The space between the studs: Feminism and architecture.”  Signs 29 (1):179-206.

Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. “A ladder of citizen participation.”  Journal of the American Institute of planners 35 (4):216-224.

Benschop, Yvonne, and Mieke Verloo. 2006. “Sisyphus’ Sisters: Can Gender Mainstreaming Escape the Genderedness of Organizations?”  Journal of Gender Studies 15 (1):19-33.

Bondi, Liz, and Hazel Christie. 2000. “Working out the urban: gender relations and the city.” In A Companion to the City, edited by Gary Bridge and Sophie Watson, 292-306. Oxford: Blackwell.

Brown, Wendy. 1992. “Finding the Man in the State.”  Feminist Studies 18 (1):7-34.

Bunch, Charlotte. 1987. Passionate politics: Feminist theory in action. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Colomina, Beatriz. 1996. “Battle Lines: E.1027.” In The sex of architecture, edited by Diana Agrest, Patricia Conway and Leslie Kanes Weisman, 167-182. New York: Harry N. Abrams.

Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics.”  University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1):139-167.

Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1991. “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color.”  Stanford law review 43 (6):1241-1299.

Delphy, Christine, and Diana Leonard. 1984. Close to home : a materialist analysis of women’s oppression. London: Hutchinson.

Di Stefano, Christine. 1988. “Dilemmas of Difference.”  Women & Politics 8 (3-4):1-24. doi: 10.1300/J014v08n03_01.

Dietz, Mary G. 1985. “Citizenship with a feminist face: the problem with maternal thinking.”  Political Theory 13 (1):19-37.

Dubrow, Gail, and Mary Corbin Sies. 2002. “Letting our guard down: Race, class, gender, and sexuality in planning history.”  Journal of Planning History 1 (3):203-214.

Dubrow, Gail Lee, and Jennifer B. Goodman. 2003. Restoring women’s history through historic preservation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Fainstein, Susan S. , and Lisa J. Servon. 2005. Gender and planning : a reader. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

Fenster, Tovi. 2005. “The Right to the Gendered City: Different Formations of Belonging in Everyday Life.”  Journal of Gender Studies 14 (3):217-231. doi: 10.1080/09589230500264109.

Forester, John. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Forsyth, Ann. 2011. “Queering Planning Practice: Understanding Non-Conformist Populations.” In Queerying planning: challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice, edited by L. Doan Petra, 21-51. Burlington, Vt: Ashgate.

Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.”  Social Text (25/26):56-80. doi: 10.2307/466240.

Friedman, Marilyn. 1987. “Beyond caring: The de-moralization of gender.”  Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13:87-110.

Frye, Marilyn. 1989. “The possibility of feminist theory.” In Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy, edited by Ann Garry and Marilyn Pearsall, 34-47. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

Gilligan, Carol. 1995. “Moral orientation and moral development.” In Justice and Care: Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics, edited by Virginia Held. Boulder: Westview Press.

Gilroy, Rose, and Chris Booth. 1999. “Building an infrastructure for everyday lives.”  European Planning Studies 7 (3):307-324.

Glass, Ruth. 1973. “The evaluation of planning: some sociological considerations.” In A Reader in Planning Theory, edited by Andreas Faludi, 45-67. New York: Pergamon Press. Original edition, International Social Science Journal 11(3), 1959.

Hammond, Cynthia. 2012. “I weep for us women: Suburbia, modernism, and feminism in the 1953 Canadian home journal housing competition.” In Rethinking Professionalism: Women and Art in Canada, 1850-1970, edited by Kristina Huneault and Janice Anderson, 194-224. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.”  Feminist studies 14 (3):575-599.

Harding, Sandra G. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Haslanger, Sally. 1995. “Ontology and social construction.”  Philosophical Topics 23 (2):95-125.

Hayden, Dolores. 1980. “What would a non-sexist city be like? Speculations on housing, urban design, and human work.”  Signs 5 (3):S170-S187.

Hayden, Dolores, and Gwendolyn Wright. 1976. “Architecture and urban planning.”  Signs 1 (4):923-933.

Healey, Patsy. 1992. “Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory.”  Town planning review 63 (2):143-162.

Healey, Patsy. 1997. Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Vancouver: Gibson Library Connections. Reprint, 2000.

Hebdige, Dick. 1979. Subculture, the meaning of style. London: Methuen.

Held, Virginia. 1990. “Feminist transformations of moral theory.”  Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (Supplement):321-344.

hooks, bell. 2000. Feminist theory: From margin to center. 2nd ed. London: Pluto Press.

Jupp, Eleanor. 2014. “Women, Communities, Neighbourhoods: Approaching Gender and Feminism within UK Urban Policy.”  Antipode 46 (5):1304-1322.

Kern, Leslie. 2013. “All aboard? Women working the spaces of gentrification in Toronto’s Junction.”  Gender, Place & Culture 20 (4):510-527. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2012.701201.

Larsson, Anita. 2006. “From equal opportunities to gender awareness in strategic spatial planning: Reflections based on Swedish experiences.”  Town Planning Review 77 (5):507-530.

Leavitt, Jacqueline. 1980. “The History, Status, and Concerns of Woman Planners.”  Signs 5 (3):S226-S230.

Leavitt, Jacqueline. 1986. “Feminist advocacy planning in the 1980s.” In Strategic Perspectives on Planning Practice, edited by Barry Checkoway, 183-194. Lexington: Lexington Books.

Longino, Helen E. 1993. “Subjects, power, and knowledge: Description and prescription in feminist philosophies of science.” In Feminist Epistemologies, edited by Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter, 101-120. New York: Routledge.

MacKinnon, Catharine. 1989. “Consciousness Raising.” In Toward a feminist theory of the state, 83-105. Cambridge: Harvard UP.

MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1982. “Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: An agenda for theory.”  Signs 7 (3):515-544.

Marcuse, Peter. 1976. “Professional ethics and beyond: values in planning.”  Journal of the American Institute of Planners 42 (3):264-274.

Markusen, Ann R. 1980. “City spatial structure, women’s household work, and national urban policy.”  Signs 5 (3):S23-S44.

McDowell, Linda. 1983. “Towards an understanding of the gender division of urban space.”  Environment and planning D: Society and Space 1 (1):59-72.

McDowell, Linda. 1992. “Doing Gender: Feminism, Feminists and Research Methods in Human Geography.”  Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17 (4):399-416. doi: 10.2307/622707.

McDowell, Linda. 1993. “Space, place and gender relations: Part I. Feminist empiricism and the geography of social relations.”  Progress in Human Geography 17 (2):157-179.

McDowell, Linda. 2009. “Working bodies : interactive service employment and workplace identities.”

Michelson, William M. 1973. The place of time in the longitudinal evaluation of spatial structures by women. Toronto: Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto.

Nochlin, Linda. 1988. “Why have there been no great women artists? (1971).” In Women, Art, and Power, 145-178. New York: Harper and Row.

Oakley, Ann, and Robin Oakley. 1979. “Sexism in official statistics.” In Demystifying Social Statistics, edited by John Irvine, Ian Miles and Jeff Evans, 172-89. London: Pluto.

Pateman, Carole, and Elizabeth Gross. 1986. Feminist challenges : social and political theory. Boston: Allen & Unwin.

Penner, Barbara. 2005. “Researching female public toilets: Gendered spaces, disciplinary limits.”  Journal of International Women’s Studies 6 (2):81-98.

Rahder, Barbara, and Carol Altilia. 2004. “Where is feminism in planning going? Appropriation or transformation?”  Planning Theory 3 (2):107-116.

Rittel, Horst WJ, and Melvin M Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning.”  Policy sciences 4 (2):155-169.

Rose, Gillian. 1993. Feminism and geography : the limits of geographical knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Rose, Gillian. 1997. “Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics.”  Progress in human geography 21 (3):305-320.

Rose, Gillian, and Miles Ogborn. 1988. “Feminism and historical geography.”  Journal of Historical Geography 14 (4):405-409.

Saegert, Susan. 1980. “Masculine Cities and Feminine Suburbs: Polarized Ideas, Contradictory Realities.”  Signs 5 (3):S96-S111.

Sandercock, Leonie. 1995. “Voices from the Borderlands: A Meditation on a Metaphor.”  Journal of Planning Education and Research 14 (2):77-88.

Sandercock, Leonie. 1998. Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history. Vol. 2, California studies in critical human geography. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.

Sandercock, Leonie. 2003. “Out of the Closet: The Importance of Stories and Storytelling in Planning Practice.”  Planning Theory & Practice 4 (1):11-28. doi: 10.1080/1464935032000057209.

Sandercock, Leonie, and Ann Forsyth. 1992. “A gender agenda: new directions for planning theory.”  Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (1):49-59.

Scott, Joan W. 1991. “The Evidence of Experience.”  Critical Inquiry 17 (4):773-797.

Sennett, Richard. 1970. The uses of disorder: personal identity & city life. New York: Knopf.

Sennett, Richard. 2000. “Reflections on the Public Realm.” In A Companion to the City, edited by Gary Bridge and Sophie Watson, 380-387. Oxford: Blackwell.

Spain, Daphne. 1992. “A gentrification research agenda for the 1990s.”  Journal of Urban Affairs 14 (2):125.

Spain, Daphne. 2001. How women saved the city. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Spain, Daphne. 2014. “Gender and Urban Space.”  Annual Review of Sociology 40:581-598.

Staeheli, Lynn A. 2004. “Mobilizing women, mobilizing gender: is it mobilizing difference?”  Gender, Place & Culture 11 (3):347-372.

Staeheli, Lynn A., Eleonore Kofman, and Linda Peake. 2004. Mapping women, making politics feminist perspectives on political geography. New York: Routledge.

Walker, Lynne. 2000. “Women and Architecture.” In Gender space architecture: An interdisciplinary introduction, edited by Jane Rendell, Barbara Penner and Iain Borden, 244-257. New York: Routledge.

Walker, Lynne. 2002. “Home making: an architectural perspective.”  Signs 27 (3):823-835.

Weeks, Kathi. 1996. “Subject for a feminist standpoint.” In Marxism beyond marxism, edited by Saree Makdisi, Cesare Casarino and Rebecca E. Karl, 89-118. New York: Routledge.

Wekerle, Gerda R. 1980. “Women in the urban environment.”  Signs 5 (3):S188-S214.

Wekerle, Gerda R. 1984. “A woman’s place is in the city.”  Antipode 16 (3):11-19.

Wekerle, Gerda R. 2004. “Framing feminist claims for urban citizenship.” In Mapping women, making politics. Feminist perspectives on political geography, edited by Lynn Staeheli, Eleonore Kofman and Linda Peake, 245-259. New York: Routledge.

Wekerle, Gerda R. 2013. “Women’s rights to the city: gendered spaces of a pluralistic citizenship.” In Democracy, citizenship and the global city, edited by Engin F Isin. New York: Routledge.

Whitzman, Carolyn. 2007. “Stuck at the front door: gender, fear of crime and the challenge of creating safer space.”  Environment and Planning A 39 (11):2715-2732.

Wilson, Elizabeth. 1992. The sphinx in the city: Urban life, the control of disorder, and women: Univ of California Press.

Women and Geography Study Group of the I. B. G. Explorations in Feminism. 1984. Geography and gender : an introduction to feminist geography. London; Dover, N.H., USA: Hutchinson, in association with the Explorations in Feminism Collective.

Young, Iris Marion. 1989. “Polity and group difference: a critique of the ideal of universal citizenship.”  Ethics 99 (2):250-274.

Young, Iris Marion. 1994. “Gender as seriality: Thinking about women as a social collective.”  Signs 19 (3):713-738.

A queer queer street? Reading Ottawa’s Le/The Village

Presented at: Queer Research Colloquium 2016, McGill University. Montreal QC.

Abstract: In 2011, “Ottawa’s main street” was officially recognized and rebranded as “The/Le Village”. Discretely marked by a few placards, rainbow stickers, and handful of LGBTQ services, the six blocks of “Le/The Village” is strangely integrated into the landscape of the urban business core. Queer geographies provide important perspectives on how the gay village has become a normalized typology while also disrupting norms and providing important spaces of difference. “The/Le Village” reveals the tension between the physical and symbolic need for spaces of belonging, and the mainstreaming—in this case mainstreeting—of marginalized identity through territorial delineations and visible markers. This paper interrogates histories and analyses of the “traditional gay village” through a reading of both the visible urban landscape and media narratives of “Le/The Village” and the ways in which it conforms and deviates from a queerly normative typology.