Presented at: Canadian Society for Jewish Studies Annual Conference, Montreal QC
Both Jews and punks are generally (mis)represented as predominantly urban cultural groups—both with histories of being “undesirable” people who occupy marginal and “undesirable” spaces of the city. Yet, little scholarship directly investigates their spatial practices and experience or their relation to dominant city-making processes such as urban planning. What is the relationship between (un)desirable people and (un)desirable spaces? Who controls the definition or creation of urban desirability? From the theoretical traditions and lived experiences of both the Jewish Diaspora and subculture, several common conflicts emerge with dominant spatial practices that control and order the city: the struggle for integration without assimilation; incongruities with the essentialist fixing of identity in territorially defined space; and negotiating perception of group identities that are systematically misrepresentation and misunderstanding from the mainstream. I argue that a radical reimagining and reading of urban place-making is possible through the alternative perspectives and practices of a multitude of marginalized and alternative groups that together can guide us towards “messier” analyses of spatial tactics and traditions. In contrast to traditional urban planning approaches, ideals and narratives, these tactical traditions have adaptively circumvented restrictions, covertly contested exclusive and dominant claims to territory, and facilitated repeated reconstitution and relocation of marginalized groups. As a preliminary iteration of this hypothesis, this paper looks at intersections between Jewish thought and subculture theory that suggest alternative readings of place-making in contrast to mainstream planning along two themes. First, I consider how futurity and utopia are imagined and enacted through spatial practices in examples from both traditions. Second, I will look at redefining style as ethics vs aesthetics as a way to open material analyses of space beyond the formal readings most commonly employed in planning and architecture histories. Finally, I elaborate on how these two alternative approaches to reading space might be rooted in shared experiences of being “undesirable” urban cultural groups.
Arendt, Hannah. 1944. “The Jew as pariah: a hidden tradition.” Jewish Social Studies 6:99-122.
Boyarin, Daniel, and Jonathan Boyarin. 1993. “Diaspora: Generation and the ground of Jewish identity.” Critical Inquiry 19 (4):693-725.
Caron, David. 2016. My father and I: The Marais and the queerness of community. Cornell University Press.
Cooper, Davina. 1996. “Talmudic Territory? Space, Law, and Modernist Discourse.” Journal of Law and Society 23 (4): 529–48. doi:10.2307/1410479.
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1):139-167.
Lee Edelman. 2004. No future: Queer theory and the death drive. Duke University Press.
Fainstein, Susan S, and Norman I Fainstein. 1971. “City planning and political values.” Urban Affairs Review 6 (3):341-362.
Hebdige, Dick. 1979. Subculture, the meaning of style. London: Methuen.
Lowy, Michael. 2017. Redemption and Utopia: Jewish libertarian thought in Central Europe. Translated by Hope Heaney. Brooklyn: Verso Books. Original edition, 1988.
Meck, Stuart. 2005. “Zoning and Anti-Semitism in the 1920s: The Case of Cleveland Jewish Orphan Home v. Village of University Heights and Its Aftermath.” Journal of Planning History 4 (2): 91–128.
More, Thomas. 1989. Utopia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. Original edition, 1516.
Muñoz, José Esteban. 2006. “Queers, Punks and the Utopian Performative.” In The Sage Handbook of Performance Studies, edited by D. Soyini Madison and Judith Hamera, 9-20. London: Sage.
Nyong’o, Tavia. 2008. “Do you want queer theory (or do you want the truth)? Intersections of punk and queer in the 1970s.” Radical History Review 100:103-119.
Schlör, Joachim. 2008. “Jews and the Big City: Explorations on an Urban State of Mind.” In Jewish topographies: visions of space, traditions of place, edited by Julia Brauch, Anna Lipphardt and Alexandra Nocke. Burlington: Ashgate.
Yiftachel, Oren. 1998. “Planning and social control: Exploring the dark side.” Journal of Planning Literature 12 (4):395-406.